|
Regular Exercise Cuts the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death
But Can Too Much Exercise Kill You?
By William J. Cromie
Harvard News Office
In the largest study ever
done to get a better handle on this question, Christine Albert and her
colleagues followed the exertions of almost 85,000 women for 24 years,
while keeping track of their hearts. The women, selected from an
ongoing study of registered nurses known as the Nurses Health Study,
were between 34 and 59 years old in 1986. From then until 2004, the
women filled out questionnaires about how much time they spent jogging,
running, bicycling, swimming, playing tennis or squash, and undertaking
other activities that require moderate to vigorous exertion.
"To our knowledge, this
analysis is the first to assess both the transient and long-term risk
of sudden cardiac death associated with physical activity among women,"
says Albert, senior author of the study and also director of the Center
for Arrhythmia Prevention at the Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women's
Hospital in Boston. Results of the study appear in the March 22/29
Journal of the American Medical Association's theme issue on Women's
Health.
The findings are
encouraging. Out of almost 85,000 women, only nine died while doing
yard work, housework, swimming, or physical therapy. To put this in
numbers, as scientists always like to do: Their investigation covered
1.93 million person years of exercise and recorded only one death for
each 36.5 million hours of exertion. In other words: Sudden cardiac
death during exertion is an extremely rare event in women.
And there's still more good
news. Regular exercise may significantly minimize this small risk, in
both the short and long term. "The women who reported exercising four
or more hours a week had a 59 percent lower risk of sudden cardiac
death over 18 years of follow-up compared to women who reported not
exercising at all," notes William Whang, lead author of the study and a
fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital. "Also, women who exercised
two or more hours a week had no elevated risk of sudden cardiac death
during exertion. This risk appeared to be primarily limited to inactive
women."
"It was not surprising that
the absolute risk of sudden cardiac death with moderate-to-vigorous
exercise was extremely low in women," comments JoAnn Manson, a
professor of women's health at Harvard who participated in the
research. "However, it was surprising that regular exercise had such a
powerful role in reducing the long-term risk of sudden death. Regular
exercise is truly a 'magic bullet' for good health." Men at higher risk
Women in this study were
more than 34 years old; would the results also apply to younger women?
"Most likely," says Manson, who is also head of the Division of
Preventive Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital. "The biological
relationships are likely to hold for younger women as well. However,
younger women have exceedingly low risks of sudden cardiac death.
"It's likely that the key
factor for all women, regardless of age, would be their habitual
exercise level," she continues. "Women who are regularly active would
be able to tolerate vigorous exercise much better than women who are
habitually sedentary, whatever their age."
No matter how high the risk rises, however, it will probably be less than for men who exercise vigorously.
This is likely related to
the heart protection women enjoy from their natural hormones during the
years before menopause, Manson believes. "After menopause women
gradually catch up with men but the gender gap for heart and blood
vessel diseases can be substantial," she says.
An earlier analysis of male
physicians done by Albert, Manson and colleagues found that men's risk
of sudden cardiac death during vigorous exertion was 19 times higher
that that of women. However, like women in the study, the most active
men enjoyed the lowest risk of sudden death during exertion.
Part of the difference,
Albert notes, could be due to including both moderate and intense
exercises in the women's study but only vigorous exertion in the male
analysis. But that's not the whole story. Similar sex differences show
up in smaller studies of men in both the United States and Finland. In
these latter studies, the same measures of exercise showed a nine- to
14-fold higher risk for men. To date, this apparent sex difference
remains unexplained.
The study of males at
Harvard, known as the Health Professional Follow-up, revealed another
benefit of regular exercise. "Physical activity is strongly associated
with better erectile functioning," reported Eric Rimm of the Harvard
School of Public Health in 2000. In an analysis, Rimm and colleagues
concluded that male health professionals, ages 51 to 87, who exercised
vigorously for 20 to 30 minutes a day, were half as likely to have
erectile dysfunction as men with the lowest level of physical activity.
(Additionally, the researchers concluded that as a man's waist size
increased, so did his chances of erectile dysfunction.)
The final conclusions of
the women's study probably apply to men: Moderate and vigorous exercise
can be done safely and, if performed regularly, may lower the long-term
risk of sudden cardiac death.
|